Anti Dumping Agreement India

by Ragini posted December 2, 2020 category Uncategorized

13 Fingers J.M., Francis Ng and Sonam Wangchuk (2000) `Antidumping as safeguard policy` presented at the University of Michigan, Gerald R.Ford School of Public Policy and Japan Economy Program Conference, October 5-6,2000. It should also be noted that a refined version of the anti-dumping regime is not the answer to existing problems. As several scientists have found, an effective competition policy is the answer to the existing problems that have plagued the anti-dumping regime. Replacing the anti-dumping regime with a competition regime will mean that domestic anti-competitive producers do not distort the market. The main reason for the conflict between the two regimes is that they use different modes to achieve the same objective, i.e. to avoid market distortions. Another problem with anti-dumping legislation is that it can have significant consequences for consumers of the product for which the government has been subject to an anti-dumping duty. As soon as the designated authority conducts an investigation and recommends anti-dumping or anti-subsidy measures, the Ministry of Finance not only makes a notification. The Director General of Protection, who operates within the ministry of finance, manages the safeguards. If the anti-dumping duty instituted on the basis of the final conclusions is higher than the provisional law already instituted and collected, the difference is not recovered. If the final anti-dumping duty is less than the provisional duty already instituted and collected, the difference is refunded.

i. To compensate for dumping or export subsidies, no item is subject to a countervailing duty or anti-dumping duty. The application should be submitted in the prescribed form to the designated authority of the Ministry of Commerce. A request for an anti-dumping investigation must contain the information reasonably available to the applicant for the following information: in the practice of free trade, companies are entitled to charge consumers the high or low price desired. But that freedom must be limited. All forms of freedom must be exercised without harming others. These companies are causing material damage to domestic industries due to lower prices for similar products. Predatory prices lead domestic companies to lose their operations and, as a result, foreign firms monopolize the market. In order to protect the domestic industry from monopoly power, anti-dumping duties serve as a protective measure. “While competition laws and anti-dumping laws were created for the same purpose (. B, for example, the 1916 anti-dumping law in the United States, which was clearly aimed at resolving competition problems arising from the practice of “transnational price deviation,” the objectives of anti-dumping legislation have evolved since then, and modern anti-dumping practices have allowed the nature of unfair and anti-competitive behaviour.

that it had to prevent. 5 The effect of anti-dumping legislation has resulted in companies choosing to seek protection from the institution of anti-dumping duties to maximize profits. However, competition law is designed to promote healthy price competition between firms as long as it is not predatory pricing. Nevertheless, anti-dumping measures are important to protect developing countries. Different countries are at different stages of development, with different rates of development. They have different sizes of savings and different nonsense conditions.

Comments are closed.